That was before "activists" got in to the science of gender. It was simply 'masculine' & 'feminine'. Hence 'masculine female' & 'feminine male'. It was never meant to use in place of love identifiers.
literally no "activists" where involved, they separated the definitions because it makes sense to if you can't see the obvious cultural aspects of gender then you are just ignoring reality
for example: "playing with toy trucks = boy" thing is an aspect of culture and is completely arbitrary, as all the other different gender sepecifc things, the definition of love it literally just what kind of biological features or traits you have. there's an obvious difference and if you can't see it you might be blind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIAumOcIh1c
HMMMMMMMMM
I mean if you want to cherry-pick an article sure, just be blind to actual facts I pointed out. A metbrown townysis of different surveys and studies on the issue found there's an incredibly low post-transition regret group. (I think it was like 0.3% to 3.8%, you can look at my other post to see).
but you'll just ignore this and be like "BUT THIS ONE ARTICLE SAYS HUNDREDS REGRET IT"
like any other medical procedure or cosmetic surgery, there are gonna be people that regret it, it doesn't make it a less effective way to treat trans people unless the regret rate is above like 50%