For Honor thread [OUT NOW!]

Poll

Best Class? (again)

Warden
10 (28.6%)
Conqueror
5 (14.3%)
Peacemaker
3 (8.6%)
Lawbringer
2 (5.7%)
Raider
1 (2.9%)
Warlord
4 (11.4%)
Beserker
0 (0%)
Valkrie
0 (0%)
Kensei
5 (14.3%)
Nobushi
3 (8.6%)
Orochi
1 (2.9%)
Shugoki
1 (2.9%)

Total Members Voted: 35

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27

Author Topic: For Honor thread [OUT NOW!]  (Read 48477 times)

RedGajin

March 02, 2017, 03:22:45 PM
anyone play the valkrye? im curious about how her new buff is, update isnt out for consoles yet

Ad Bot

Advertisement

Trogtor

March 05, 2017, 11:00:48 AM
Quote from: RedGajin on March 02, 2017, 03:22:45 PM
anyone play the valkrye? im curious about how her new buff is, update isnt out for consoles yet
i hate anyone who plays her

also who here has this game on pc i wanna count

Mr. Bones

March 05, 2017, 01:58:40 PM
Quote from: RedGajin on March 02, 2017, 03:22:45 PM
anyone play the valkrye? im curious about how her new buff is, update isnt out for consoles yet
Haven't tried out the buff, but the character overall is pretty good. Glad they buffed her attack recovery time though, you hit someone with a light attack and they block it and she recovers so slow that you (most of the time) can't even do her shield bash. It's loving annoying how a simple block from any character makes her pretty much fly back in shock for like half a second.

King Tøny

March 05, 2017, 02:06:33 PM
Why are there females though? There were maybe 1 female out of 2,000,000+ males in actual wars back then.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2017, 02:08:22 PM by King Tøny »

Foxscotch

March 05, 2017, 02:09:22 PM
Quote from: King Tøny on March 05, 2017, 02:06:33 PM
Why are there females though? There were maybe 1 female out of 2,000,000+ males in actual wars back then.
yeah and vikings, knights, and samurais definitely fought each other a lot too

King Tøny

March 05, 2017, 02:10:54 PM
Quote from: Foxscotch on March 05, 2017, 02:09:22 PM
yeah and vikings, knights, and samurais definitely fought each other a lot too

They were all in the same time period, it was entirely possible.

In fact it is more plausible for vikings, knights and samurais to all fight each other than having female fighters on the battlefield.

King Tøny

March 05, 2017, 02:14:45 PM
Also the peace keeper knight class is clearly only for the Assassin's Creed fanbase.

Medieval assassins didn't look like that nor dual wielded daggers.

Shift Kitty

March 05, 2017, 03:44:12 PM
i mean, nevermind the realism of the entire story. lets complain about customization.

Poliwhirl

March 05, 2017, 03:59:53 PM
Quote from: King Tøny on March 05, 2017, 02:10:54 PM
They were all in the same time period, it was entirely possible.

In fact it is more plausible for vikings, knights and samurais to all fight each other than having female fighters on the battlefield.
it's more likely that there were female warriors on the battlefield than it is you ever getting laid

Foxscotch

March 05, 2017, 04:03:16 PM
Quote from: Poliwhirl on March 05, 2017, 03:59:53 PM
it's more likely that there were female warriors on the battlefield than it is you ever getting laid
closest he ever got was being cucked by his "girlfriend"

RedGajin

March 05, 2017, 04:54:57 PM
Quote from: King Tøny on March 05, 2017, 02:06:33 PM
Why are there females though? There were maybe 1 female out of 2,000,000+ males in actual wars back then.
the entire games fictional lmao
Quote from: Mr. Bones on March 05, 2017, 01:58:40 PM
Haven't tried out the buff, but the character overall is pretty good. Glad they buffed her attack recovery time though, you hit someone with a light attack and they block it and she recovers so slow that you (most of the time) can't even do her shield bash. It's loving annoying how a simple block from any character makes her pretty much fly back in shock for like half a second.
i played her for a while, but she was trash before the buff. her recovery time is hella bad, and she does no damage. looks like they completely redid all that tho

Kumquat

March 05, 2017, 06:07:55 PM
Quote from: King Tøny on March 05, 2017, 02:14:45 PM
Also the peace keeper knight class is clearly only for the Assassin's Creed fanbase.
This for real tho

Mr. Bones

March 06, 2017, 06:59:22 AM
Quote from: King Tøny on March 05, 2017, 02:10:54 PM
They were all in the same time period, it was entirely possible.

In fact it is more plausible for vikings, knights and samurais to all fight each other than having female fighters on the battlefield.
No they weren't dude. Vikings and Knights only fought in the 11th century, and in that century knights really only had chainmail. Samurai never fought Knights nor Vikings, despite being around in the 12th century, because they never set out for conquest. Would they have stood a chance in those centuries against Knights? Yes. In 14-16th centuries? No. Knights had superior armor and Samurai fought mainly with bows on horseback, and Knights were pretty much impervious to all types of bows (other than ballistas probably).

RedGajin

March 06, 2017, 09:39:58 AM
so im kindve curious as to what the new heroes are gonna be. are they going to do a different class, or will they fit into one of the existing classes (heavy, vangueard, ect)? im expecting something similar to a spartan to be added to the knights class eventually, spear and shield kindve of deal similar to the valkarye. maybe a guy with a big hammer? for the samurai, i dont have any guesses besides theyll probably add some sort of person wielding two weapons like the PK and berserker

also why does no one use mics in this game smh

King Tøny

March 06, 2017, 10:04:52 AM
Quote from: Mr. Bones on March 06, 2017, 06:59:22 AM
No they weren't dude. Vikings and Knights only fought in the 11th century, and in that century knights really only had chainmail.

So obviously for honor doesn't know their stuff then.
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27
« previous next »