Total Members Voted: 183
Except that if the ranged weapons did adequate damage, why would anybody ever pick melee weapons when they can kill from a distance? In game theory, it's called "dominant strategy".I'm still against ranged weapons being mixed with a melee pack.
Then make them have a limit. Crossbow would have a reload time after each shot, Tomahawk would be one or two throws, etc.
I don't play stuffty games.And why can't you leave my opinion alone?
wow lol
Nobody wants to hear your opinion on my opinion.Not even this nobody. Bother somebody else.
I have never even heard of "s4".Your point didn't point much out for me.I assume TF2 is a good comparison? And even then, those games aren't melee based having ranged and melee weapons mixed on purpose in a balanced way.
Looked like something from MH lol But I only ever had MHT3 so I'm not familiar with bows.just sayin', make a switch axe, I'd suck your richard(s) Deadzone-snip-It is worth mentioning if you ever in 1 trillion years considered scripting that:that one's made of bone/ironthat's a big animation that includes the entire player body so probably a noit's basically a 4-hand sword lol
If you have no clue what you are talking about (and you don't), don't talk. It is not a complicated concept.
He knows what he's saying.
I don't play stuffty games.
I have never even heard of "s4".I assume TF2 is a good comparison?
he has no idea what he is talking about.